Nurses' Perspectives on Assisted Suicide: Challenges and Support Needs

Autor(en)
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Tamina-Laetitia Vielgrader, Arzu Petersen, Alexa L. Meyer, Nadine Brunevskaya, Matthias Unseld
Abstrakt

Background: Assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death, remains a contentious issue for healthcare providers, involving medical ethics, legal frameworks, and individual rights. This study aims to explore the attitudes, experiences, and training needs of nurses in Austria following the legalization of assisted suicide in 2022. Methods: Utilizing a cross-sectional online survey, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 280 palliative and hospice care nurses across all nine Austrian states. Results: Approximately a quarter of nurses experienced a shift in their attitudes towards assisted suicide during the first year of its legalization. While a majority felt their wellbeing was unaffected, 14.5% reported a decline in mental health due to the new law. Despite both mandatory and optional training being provided by employers, 80.7% of nurses expressed a need for further education, particularly on legal and organizational aspects, practical case studies, and interdisciplinary communication. Qualitative analysis revealed diverse perspectives, with some nurses advocating for patient autonomy and empathetic support, while others preferred enhancing palliative care as an alternative to assisted suicide. Furthermore, nurses highlighted the necessity for a clear legal framework and collaborative decision-making processes. Conclusion: The study underscores the critical role of comprehensive palliative care and calls for more clarity around appropriate assisted suicide practices. Ongoing dialogue, enhanced training, and support for nurses to navigate both ethical and practical challenges posed by assisted suicide legislation is also needed. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and explore the long-term impacts of assisted suicide on patients, their families, and healthcare providers.

Organisation(en)
Institut für Klinische und Gesundheitspsychologie, Institut für Ethik und Recht in der Medizin
Externe Organisation(en)
Universität Wien, Haus der Barmherzigkeit
Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Band
366
ISSN
0277-9536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117663
Publikationsdatum
12-2024
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ÖFOS 2012
501010 Klinische Psychologie, 303019 Medizinische Ethik, 303022 Palliativpflege
Schlagwörter
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Health(social science), History and Philosophy of Science
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Link zum Portal
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/de/publications/ac5b04d7-c0df-45c6-93f1-fb03cc705976